UPSC Maths Optional · Paper II · Full Proofs + PYQs 2000–2026
If \(H\) is a subgroup of a finite group \(G\), then \(|H|\) divides \(|G|\).
Step 1 Define left cosets \(aH=\{ah:h\in H\}\) for \(a\in G\).
Step 2 Cosets partition \(G\): Define \(a\sim b\iff a^{-1}b\in H\). This is an equivalence relation (reflexive: \(a^{-1}a=e\in H\); symmetric: \(a^{-1}b\in H\Rightarrow b^{-1}a=(a^{-1}b)^{-1}\in H\); transitive: \(a^{-1}b,b^{-1}c\in H\Rightarrow a^{-1}c=(a^{-1}b)(b^{-1}c)\in H\)). The equivalence class of \(a\) is \(aH\).
Step 3 All cosets have same size: Map \(\phi:H\to aH\) by \(\phi(h)=ah\) is a bijection (injective: \(ah=ah'\Rightarrow h=h'\); surjective: obvious). So \(|aH|=|H|\).
Step 4 \(G\) is partitioned into cosets, each of size \(|H|\). If there are \(k\) cosets: \(|G|=k|H|\). So \(|H|\mid|G|\). \(\blacksquare\)
Corollaries: Order of any element divides \(|G|\). Every group of prime order is cyclic.
If \(\phi:G\to H\) is a group homomorphism, then \(G/\ker\phi\cong\text{Im}(\phi)\).
Let \(K=\ker\phi\). Define \(\tilde\phi:G/K\to\text{Im}(\phi)\) by \(\tilde\phi(aK)=\phi(a)\).
Well-defined: If \(aK=bK\Rightarrow a^{-1}b\in K\Rightarrow\phi(a^{-1}b)=e\Rightarrow\phi(a)^{-1}\phi(b)=e\Rightarrow\phi(a)=\phi(b)\).
Homomorphism: \(\tilde\phi(aK\cdot bK)=\tilde\phi(abK)=\phi(ab)=\phi(a)\phi(b)=\tilde\phi(aK)\tilde\phi(bK)\).
Injective: \(\tilde\phi(aK)=e\Rightarrow\phi(a)=e\Rightarrow a\in K\Rightarrow aK=K=e_{G/K}\).
Surjective: For any \(\phi(a)\in\text{Im}(\phi)\): \(\tilde\phi(aK)=\phi(a)\). \(\blacksquare\)
\(N\trianglelefteq G\iff gNg^{-1}=N\ \forall g\iff\) left cosets = right cosets \(\iff G/N\) is a group.
Define multiplication on \(G/N\): \((aN)(bN)=abN\). Well-defined: If \(aN=a'N\) and \(bN=b'N\): \(a'=an_1,b'=bn_2\). Then \(a'b'=an_1bn_2=ab(b^{-1}n_1b)n_2=ab\cdot m\in abN\) (using \(b^{-1}n_1b\in N\) by normality). So \(a'b'N=abN\). Other group axioms follow from \(G\). \(\blacksquare\)
For each \(g\in G\), define \(\lambda_g:G\to G\) by \(\lambda_g(x)=gx\) (left multiplication). Each \(\lambda_g\) is a bijection (inverse: \(\lambda_{g^{-1}}\)). The map \(\phi:G\to S_G\) by \(\phi(g)=\lambda_g\) is a group homomorphism: \(\phi(gh)=\lambda_{gh}=\lambda_g\circ\lambda_h=\phi(g)\phi(h)\). Injective: \(\ker\phi=\{g:\lambda_g=\text{id}\}=\{g:gx=x\ \forall x\}=\{e\}\). By first isomorphism theorem: \(G\cong\text{Im}(\phi)\le S_G\). \(\blacksquare\)
Every subgroup of a cyclic group is cyclic. If \(G=\langle a\rangle\) has order \(n\), then for each \(d\mid n\): there is exactly one subgroup of order \(d\), namely \(\langle a^{n/d}\rangle\).
Let \(H\le\langle a\rangle\). If \(H=\{e\}\): cyclic. Otherwise: let \(m\) be the smallest positive integer with \(a^m\in H\). Claim \(H=\langle a^m\rangle\). If \(a^k\in H\): write \(k=qm+r\), \(0\le r
If \(p^k\mid|G|\), then \(G\) has a subgroup of order \(p^k\). In particular, if \(p^m\mid|G|\) but \(p^{m+1}\nmid|G|\), there exists a subgroup of order \(p^m\) (a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup).
Let \(|G|=p^m\cdot s\) with \(\gcd(p,s)=1\). Let \(G\) act on \(\mathcal{X}=\{S\subset G:|S|=p^m\}\) by \(g\cdot S=gS\). \(|\mathcal{X}|=\binom{p^ms}{p^m}\). One can show \(\gcd(|\mathcal{X}|,p)=1\) (key combinatorial fact). So not all orbits have size divisible by \(p\). Some orbit \(\mathcal{O}\) has \(|\mathcal{O}|\) not divisible by \(p\). For \(S\in\mathcal{O}\): stabilizer \(H=G_S=\{g\in G:gS=S\}\) has order \(|G|/|\mathcal{O}|=p^m s/|\mathcal{O}|\). Since \(p\nmid|\mathcal{O}|\): \(p^m\mid|H|\). Also \(|H|\le p^m\) (by embedding \(H\hookrightarrow\text{bij}(S)\)). So \(|H|=p^m\). \(\blacksquare\)
Let \(P\) be a fixed Sylow \(p\)-subgroup. Let \(G\) act on \(\mathcal{S}=\{\text{all Sylow }p\text{-subgroups}\}\) by conjugation. By 2nd theorem, this action is transitive: all are conjugate. So \(n_p=|\mathcal{S}|=[G:N_G(P)]\). Since \(P\le N_G(P)\le G\): \(n_p=[G:N_G(P)]\mid[G:P]=m\). Now let \(P\) act on \(\mathcal{S}\) by conjugation. A fixed point \(Q\in\mathcal{S}\): \(PQP^{-1}=Q\Rightarrow P\le N_G(Q)\Rightarrow PQ\le G\). \(|PQ|=|P||Q|/|P\cap Q|\). If \(P\ne Q\): \(PQ\) is not a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup unless \(P=Q\). The unique fixed point of \(P\) acting on \(\mathcal{S}\) is \(P\) itself. So \(n_p=|\mathcal{S}|\equiv1\pmod p\). \(\blacksquare\)
\((\Rightarrow)\) Let \(M\) be maximal in commutative ring \(R\). Let \(a+M\ne0\) in \(R/M\). Consider the ideal \(M+Ra=\{m+ra:m\in M,r\in R\}\supseteq M\). By maximality of \(M\): \(M+Ra=R\). So \(\exists m\in M,s\in R\) with \(m+sa=1\). In \(R/M\): \((s+M)(a+M)=sa+M=1-m+M=1+M\). So \(a+M\) has inverse \(s+M\). \(R/M\) is a field.
\((\Leftarrow)\) If \(R/M\) is a field: let \(I\supsetneq M\) be an ideal. Then \(\exists a\in I\setminus M\). In \(R/M\), \(a+M\ne0\), so invertible: \(\exists b\) with \(ab+M=M+1\Rightarrow ab-1\in M\subset I\Rightarrow 1\in I\Rightarrow I=R\). So \(M\) is maximal. \(\blacksquare\)
\(P\) is prime iff \(ab\in P\Rightarrow a\in P\) or \(b\in P\). In \(R/P\): \((a+P)(b+P)=0+P\iff ab\in P\iff a\in P\) or \(b\in P\iff a+P=0\) or \(b+P=0\). So \(R/P\) has no zero divisors iff \(P\) is prime. \(\blacksquare\)
Let \(D\) be a finite integral domain and \(a\ne0\). Consider the map \(\phi:D\to D\) by \(\phi(x)=ax\). Injective: \(ax=ay\Rightarrow a(x-y)=0\Rightarrow x-y=0\) (no zero divisors). Surjective: injective map on finite set is surjective. So \(\exists b\in D\) with \(ab=1\). So \(a\) is a unit. Every nonzero element is a unit: \(D\) is a field. \(\blacksquare\)
Let \(f(x)=a_nx^n+\cdots+a_0\in\mathbb{Z}[x]\). If a prime \(p\) satisfies: \(p\nmid a_n\), \(p\mid a_i\) for \(i
By Gauss's lemma: irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\iff\) primitive and irreducible over \(\mathbb{Z}\). Suppose \(f=gh\) in \(\mathbb{Z}[x]\), \(g=b_sx^s+\cdots+b_0\), \(h=c_tx^t+\cdots+c_0\), \(s+t=n\). Since \(p\mid a_0=b_0c_0\) but \(p^2\nmid a_0\): exactly one of \(b_0,c_0\) is divisible by \(p\). WLOG \(p\mid b_0\) and \(p\nmid c_0\). Since \(p\nmid a_n=b_sc_t\): \(p\nmid b_s\). Let \(r\) be the smallest index with \(p\nmid b_r\). Then \(a_r=b_0c_r+b_1c_{r-1}+\cdots+b_rc_0\). Since \(p\mid b_0,\ldots,b_{r-1}\) and \(p\mid a_r\) (for \(r
List all elements of \(S_4\), their cycle types, and orders. How many elements have order 4?
Cycle types and orders in \(S_4\): (1): \(e\) — order 1 (1 element). (2): transpositions — order 2 (\(\binom42=6\) elements). (2,2): two disjoint transpositions — order 2 (\(3\) elements: \((12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23)\)). (3): 3-cycles — order 3 (\(2\binom43=8\) elements). (4): 4-cycles — order 4 (\(3!=6\) elements). (3,1) same as (3). Total: \(1+6+3+8+6=24=4!\). Elements of order 4: the six 4-cycles.
Find the center of \(S_3\).
Center \(Z(G)=\{g\in G:gx=xg\ \forall x\}\). In \(S_3\): check if any non-identity element commutes with all. Take \((12)\): \((12)(123)=(132)(12)\ne(12)(123)=(23)\). Actually: \((12)(123)=(23)\) and \((123)(12)=(13)\). Not equal. So no non-identity element commutes with everything. \(Z(S_3)=\{e\}\).
Show that every group of order 15 is cyclic.
\(|G|=15=3\cdot5\). Sylow: \(n_5\equiv1\pmod5\) and \(n_5\mid3\Rightarrow n_5=1\). So unique Sylow 5-subgroup \(P_5\trianglelefteq G\). \(n_3\equiv1\pmod3\) and \(n_3\mid5\Rightarrow n_3=1\). So unique Sylow 3-subgroup \(P_3\trianglelefteq G\). \(|P_3|=3,|P_5|=5\Rightarrow P_3\cap P_5=\{e\}\). \(P_3P_5\le G\), \(|P_3P_5|=15\Rightarrow G=P_3P_5\cong P_3\times P_5\cong\mathbb{Z}_3\times\mathbb{Z}_5\cong\mathbb{Z}_{15}\) (since \(\gcd(3,5)=1\)). Cyclic. \(\blacksquare\)
Find all left cosets of \(H=\{e,(12)\}\) in \(S_3\).
\(S_3=\{e,(12),(13),(23),(123),(132)\}\). \(eH=H=\{e,(12)\}\). \((13)H=\{(13),(13)(12)\}=\{(13),(132)\}\). \((23)H=\{(23),(23)(12)\}=\{(23),(123)\}\). Three cosets, each of size 2. \([S_3:H]=3\). (Note: \(H\) is NOT normal since left coset \((13)H=\{(13),(132)\}\ne H(13)=\{(13),(123)\}\).)
Show that \(\mathbb{Z}\) is generated by any two coprime integers \(m,n\).
\(\langle m,n\rangle\) is a subgroup of \(\mathbb{Z}\), hence of the form \(d\mathbb{Z}\) for some \(d\ge0\). Since \(m,n\in\langle m,n\rangle=d\mathbb{Z}\): \(d\mid m\) and \(d\mid n\Rightarrow d\mid\gcd(m,n)=1\Rightarrow d=1\). So \(\langle m,n\rangle=\mathbb{Z}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that the set of even integers forms a group under addition. Is it isomorphic to \((\mathbb{Z},+)\)?
Even integers \(2\mathbb{Z}\): closed under \(+\), associative (inherited), identity \(0\), inverses \(-2n\). Group. Define \(\phi:\mathbb{Z}\to2\mathbb{Z}\) by \(\phi(n)=2n\). Bijective (injective: \(2m=2n\Rightarrow m=n\); surjective: \(2n\in2\mathbb{Z}\)). Homomorphism: \(\phi(m+n)=2(m+n)=2m+2n=\phi(m)+\phi(n)\). Isomorphism: \(2\mathbb{Z}\cong\mathbb{Z}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Classify all abelian groups of order \(p^2\) (p prime).
By fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups: abelian groups of order \(p^2\) are either \(\mathbb{Z}_{p^2}\) (cyclic) or \(\mathbb{Z}_p\times\mathbb{Z}_p\) (elementary abelian). These are the only two, up to isomorphism. They are non-isomorphic since \(\mathbb{Z}_{p^2}\) has an element of order \(p^2\) while all non-identity elements of \(\mathbb{Z}_p\times\mathbb{Z}_p\) have order \(p\).
If \(\phi:\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}_n\) is defined by \(\phi(k)=k\pmod n\), find \(\ker\phi\) and apply First Isomorphism Theorem.
\(\phi\) is a ring (and group) homomorphism. \(\ker\phi=\{k\in\mathbb{Z}:n\mid k\}=n\mathbb{Z}\). \(\text{Im}(\phi)=\mathbb{Z}_n\) (surjective). By First Isomorphism Theorem: \(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}\cong\mathbb{Z}_n\). \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that \(A_n\) (alternating group) is normal in \(S_n\) and find \(S_n/A_n\).
The sign homomorphism \(\text{sgn}:S_n\to\{+1,-1\}\) (multiplicative) is surjective with \(\ker(\text{sgn})=A_n\). So \(A_n\trianglelefteq S_n\) (kernel of homomorphism). By First Isomorphism Theorem: \(S_n/A_n\cong\{+1,-1\}\cong\mathbb{Z}_2\). Index \([S_n:A_n]=2\). \(\blacksquare\)
Describe the quotient group \(\mathbb{Z}/6\mathbb{Z}\). List its elements, their orders, and identify the group.
Elements: \(\{0+6\mathbb{Z},1+6\mathbb{Z},2+6\mathbb{Z},3+6\mathbb{Z},4+6\mathbb{Z},5+6\mathbb{Z}\}\cong\{0,1,2,3,4,5\}\). Under \(+\pmod6\): cyclic of order 6, generated by \(1+6\mathbb{Z}\). Orders: \(o(0)=1,o(1)=6,o(2)=3,o(3)=2,o(4)=3,o(5)=6\). Isomorphic to \(\mathbb{Z}_6\). \(\blacksquare\)
Find all group homomorphisms from \(\mathbb{Z}_4\) to \(\mathbb{Z}_6\).
A homomorphism \(\phi:\mathbb{Z}_4\to\mathbb{Z}_6\) is determined by \(\phi(1)\). We need \(4\phi(1)\equiv0\pmod6\Rightarrow\phi(1)\in\{0,3\}\) (since \(4k\equiv0\pmod6\iff 6\mid4k\iff3\mid2k\iff3\mid k\)... actually: \(\text{ord}(\phi(1))\mid\gcd(4,6)=2\). Elements of \(\mathbb{Z}_6\) with order dividing 2: \(\{0,3\}\)). So two homomorphisms: \(\phi(1)=0\) (trivial) and \(\phi(1)=3\) (image = \(\{0,3\}\cong\mathbb{Z}_2\)).
Show every group of order 35 is cyclic.
\(35=5\cdot7\). \(n_7\equiv1\pmod7,n_7\mid5\Rightarrow n_7=1\). \(n_5\equiv1\pmod5,n_5\mid7\Rightarrow n_5=1\). Both Sylow subgroups are normal and unique. \(P_5P_7=G\), \(P_5\cap P_7=\{e\}\). \(G\cong\mathbb{Z}_5\times\mathbb{Z}_7\cong\mathbb{Z}_{35}\). Cyclic. \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that every group of order 45 is abelian.
\(45=3^2\cdot5\). \(n_5\equiv1\pmod5,n_5\mid9\Rightarrow n_5\in\{1\}\) (since 6 not \(\equiv1\pmod5\), and \(1,9\): \(9\equiv4\ne1\)). So \(n_5=1\Rightarrow P_5\trianglelefteq G\). \(n_3\equiv1\pmod3,n_3\mid5\Rightarrow n_3=1\Rightarrow P_3\trianglelefteq G\). \(|P_3|=9=3^2\): groups of order \(p^2\) are abelian. \(|P_5|=5\): cyclic, abelian. \(G\cong P_3\times P_5\): product of abelian groups is abelian. \(\blacksquare\)
Find the Sylow 2-subgroups of \(S_4\) and their number.
\(|S_4|=24=2^3\cdot3\). Sylow 2-subgroups have order 8. \(n_2\equiv1\pmod2,n_2\mid3\Rightarrow n_2\in\{1,3\}\). The three Sylow 2-subgroups are the three copies of \(D_4\) (dihedral group) in \(S_4\): \(\langle(1234),(13)\rangle\), \(\langle(1324),(12)\rangle\), \(\langle(1243),(14)\rangle\)... more precisely, there are \(n_2=3\) Sylow 2-subgroups, each isomorphic to \(D_4\).
Let \(|G|=pq\) with \(p \lt q\) primes and \(p\nmid(q-1)\). Show \(G\cong\mathbb{Z}_{pq}\).
\(n_q\equiv1\pmod q,n_q\mid p\Rightarrow n_q=1\) (since \(n_q=p\) would require \(p\equiv1\pmod q\Rightarrow p\ge q\), contradiction). So \(P_q\trianglelefteq G\). \(n_p\equiv1\pmod p,n_p\mid q\Rightarrow n_p\in\{1,q\}\). If \(n_p=q\): \(q\equiv1\pmod p\Rightarrow p\mid(q-1)\). Contradicts hypothesis. So \(n_p=1\Rightarrow P_p\trianglelefteq G\). Then \(G\cong P_p\times P_q\cong\mathbb{Z}_p\times\mathbb{Z}_q\cong\mathbb{Z}_{pq}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that \(I=n\mathbb{Z}\) is an ideal in \(\mathbb{Z}\). When is it maximal?
Ideal: (i) \(0\in I\). (ii) \(na,nb\in I\Rightarrow n(a-b)\in I\). (iii) For any \(r\in\mathbb{Z}\): \(r\cdot na=n(ra)\in I\). So \(I\) is an ideal. Maximal iff \(n\) is prime: \(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}\cong\mathbb{Z}_n\) is a field iff \(n\) is prime. By the theorem: maximal ideal iff quotient is a field. \(\blacksquare\)
Show that every ideal in the Gaussian integers \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\) is principal.
\(\mathbb{Z}[i]\) is a Euclidean domain with norm \(N(a+bi)=a^2+b^2\). Every Euclidean domain is a PID (standard result). Proof sketch: given ideal \(I\ne0\), take \(d\in I\) with \(N(d)\) minimal. For any \(a\in I\): by division algorithm in Euclidean domain, \(a=qd+r\) with \(N(r)
If \(\phi:\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}_6\) and \(\phi:\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}_4\) are natural projections, find \(\ker(\phi\times\phi')\).
Define \(\psi:\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}_6\times\mathbb{Z}_4\) by \(\psi(n)=(n\bmod6,n\bmod4)\). \(\ker\psi=\{n:\text{lcm}(6,4)\mid n\}=12\mathbb{Z}\). By CRT (\(\gcd(6,4)=2\ne1\)): image is not all of \(\mathbb{Z}_6\times\mathbb{Z}_4\). Image = \(\{(a,b):a\equiv b\pmod2\}\), of size 12.
Find all units in \(\mathbb{Z}/12\mathbb{Z}\).
Units are elements coprime to 12: \(\{1,5,7,11\}\) (i.e., \(\gcd(k,12)=1\)). \(|\text{units}|=\phi(12)=4\). They form the group \((\mathbb{Z}/12\mathbb{Z})^\times\cong\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2\) (Klein 4-group).
Show \(f(x)=x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\).
Substitute \(x\to x+1\): \(f(x+1)=\dfrac{(x+1)^5-1}{x}=x^4+5x^3+10x^2+10x+5\). Apply Eisenstein with \(p=5\): \(5\nmid1\) (leading), \(5\mid5,10,10,5\), \(25\nmid5\). So \(f(x+1)\) is irreducible, hence \(f(x)\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show \(f(x)=x^3-3x+1\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\).
By rational root theorem: possible rational roots are \(\pm1\). \(f(1)=1-3+1=-1\ne0\), \(f(-1)=-1+3+1=3\ne0\). So \(f\) has no rational roots. Since \(\deg f=3\): no rational roots iff irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show \(p(x)=x^p-p\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\) for prime \(p\).
Apply Eisenstein with the prime \(p\): \(p\nmid1\) (leading coeff), \(p\mid p\) (constant term), \(p^2\nmid p\). All middle coefficients are 0, hence divisible by \(p\). Eisenstein's criterion: \(x^p-p\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show \(f(x)=x^3+x+1\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\).
Rational root check: \(\pm1\) are only candidates. \(f(1)=3\ne0,f(-1)=-1\ne0\). No rational roots → irreducible (degree 3 with no rational root is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\)). Alternatively: mod 2 gives \(\bar f(x)=x^3+x+1\in\mathbb{F}_2[x]\). Check \(\bar f(0)=1\ne0,\bar f(1)=1\ne0\) in \(\mathbb{F}_2\). So \(\bar f\) has no roots in \(\mathbb{F}_2\), hence irreducible over \(\mathbb{F}_2\) (degree 3). By mod-\(p\) criterion: \(f\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Find \(\gcd(3+4i, 4+3i)\) in \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\).
\(N(3+4i)=25=5^2\), \(N(4+3i)=25=5^2\). Use Euclidean algorithm: \((4+3i)/(3+4i)=(4+3i)(3-4i)/25=(12+16-9i+12i\cdot... \)
\((4+3i)(3-4i)=12-16i+9i-12i^2=12+12+(-16+9)i=24-7i\). Divide by 25: quotient \(\approx1\) (round: \(q=1+0i\) or check \((24-7i)/25\approx(1,-0.28)\to q=1\)). Remainder: \((4+3i)-1(3+4i)=1-i\). \(N(1-i)=2\). Now \(\gcd(3+4i,1-i)\): \((3+4i)/(1-i)=(3+4i)(1+i)/2=(3+4i+3i+4i^2)/2=(-1+7i)/2\). Not integer — take \(q=-1+4i\)/2... better: \((3+4i)=q(1-i)+r\). \((3+4i)/(1-i)=(3+4i)(1+i)/2=(-1+7i)/2\). Round to \(q=(0+4i)\): \(r=(3+4i)-(4i)(1-i)=(3+4i)-(4i+4)=(−1)\). So \(r=−1\), \(N(r)=1\). So \(\gcd=1-i\) (up to units). \(\gcd(3+4i,4+3i)=1+i\) (since \((1-i)\) and \((1+i)\) are associates: \(1-i=-i(1+i)\)).
Factor \(10=2\cdot5\) in \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\).
\(2=-i(1+i)^2\) (up to units: \(N(1+i)=2\), \((1+i)^2=2i\), and \(2=(-i)(2i)=-i\cdot2i=2\)... so \(2=-i(1+i)^2\), a prime associated to \((1+i)\) (ramified)). \(5=(2+i)(2-i)\) (split: \(N(2+i)=5\), \((2+i)\) and \((2-i)\) are primes). So \(10=(-i)(1+i)^2(2+i)(2-i)\). The factorization in \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\) is essentially \(10=-i(1+i)^2(2+i)(2-i)\) (up to unit \(-i\)). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that \(G=\{1,-1,i,-i\}\) forms a group under complex multiplication.
Closure: Product of any two elements stays in \(G\): \(i\cdot i=-1\in G\), \(i\cdot(-1)=-i\in G\), etc. (all 16 products verified by Cayley table). Associativity: Inherited from \(\mathbb{C}\). Identity: \(1\in G\), and \(1\cdot g=g\cdot1=g\) for all \(g\). Inverses: \(1^{-1}=1\), \((-1)^{-1}=-1\), \(i^{-1}=-i\in G\), \((-i)^{-1}=i\in G\). All axioms satisfied, so \(G\) is a group. Note \(G\cong\mathbb{Z}_4\) (cyclic of order 4, generated by \(i\)). \(\blacksquare\)
Find all subgroups of \(\mathbb{Z}_{12}\) and draw the subgroup lattice.
By Lagrange, subgroup orders must divide \(12\). Divisors: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12. Since \(\mathbb{Z}_{12}\) is cyclic, it has exactly one subgroup of each order dividing 12: \(\langle0\rangle=\{0\}\) (order 1), \(\langle6\rangle=\{0,6\}\) (order 2), \(\langle4\rangle=\{0,4,8\}\) (order 3), \(\langle3\rangle=\{0,3,6,9\}\) (order 4), \(\langle2\rangle=\{0,2,4,6,8,10\}\) (order 6), \(\mathbb{Z}_{12}\) (order 12). Lattice: \(\mathbb{Z}_{12}\) at top, \(\langle2\rangle\) and \(\langle3\rangle\) below it, \(\langle4\rangle\) and \(\langle6\rangle\) below those, \(\{0\}\) at bottom. \(\blacksquare\)
State and prove Lagrange's theorem: the order of any subgroup \(H\) of a finite group \(G\) divides \(|G|\).
For any \(a\in G\), the left coset \(aH=\{ah:h\in H\}\). Key facts: (1) \(|aH|=|H|\) (map \(h\mapsto ah\) is a bijection). (2) Two cosets are either equal or disjoint: if \(aH\cap bH\ne\emptyset\), then \(ah_1=bh_2\), so \(b^{-1}a=h_2h_1^{-1}\in H\), giving \(aH=bH\). (3) \(G\) is the disjoint union of all distinct left cosets. If there are \(k\) distinct cosets, then \(|G|=k|H|\), so \(|H|\mid|G|\). The index \([G:H]=k=|G|/|H|\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that every group of prime order \(p\) is cyclic.
Let \(|G|=p\) (prime) and pick any \(g\ne e\). The subgroup \(\langle g\rangle\) has order dividing \(p\) (Lagrange). Since \(g\ne e\), \(|\langle g\rangle|\ne1\). As \(p\) is prime, \(|\langle g\rangle|=p\). Thus \(\langle g\rangle=G\), so \(G\) is cyclic. Consequence: groups of prime order are simple and abelian. \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that any subgroup \(H\) of index 2 in a group \(G\) is normal.
\([G:H]=2\) means there are exactly two left cosets: \(H\) and \(G\setminus H\), and exactly two right cosets: \(H\) and \(G\setminus H\). For any \(g\in H\): \(gH=H=Hg\). For any \(g\notin H\): the unique left coset other than \(H\) is \(gH=G\setminus H\), and similarly \(Hg=G\setminus H\). Thus \(gH=Hg\) for all \(g\in G\), so \(H\trianglelefteq G\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that the center \(Z(G)=\{z\in G: zg=gz\ \forall g\in G\}\) is a normal abelian subgroup of \(G\).
Subgroup: \(e\in Z(G)\). If \(z_1,z_2\in Z(G)\), then \((z_1z_2)g=z_1(z_2g)=z_1(gz_2)=(z_1g)z_2=(gz_1)z_2=g(z_1z_2)\), so \(z_1z_2\in Z(G)\). If \(z\in Z(G)\), then \(z^{-1}g=(g^{-1}z)^{-1}=(zg^{-1})^{-1}=gz^{-1}\), so \(z^{-1}\in Z(G)\). Abelian: Any two elements of \(Z(G)\) commute with everything, hence with each other. Normal: For any \(g\in G,z\in Z(G)\): \(gzg^{-1}=z\in Z(G)\), so \(gZ(G)g^{-1}=Z(G)\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that the alternating group \(A_n\) is a normal subgroup of \(S_n\) with \([S_n:A_n]=2\).
Define the sign homomorphism \(\text{sgn}:S_n\to\{+1,-1\}\) by \(\text{sgn}(\sigma)=(-1)^k\) where \(k\) is the number of transpositions in any decomposition of \(\sigma\) (well-defined). Then \(A_n=\ker(\text{sgn})\), which is normal in \(S_n\) as kernels of homomorphisms are always normal. Since \(\text{sgn}\) is surjective (any transposition maps to \(-1\)), by the first isomorphism theorem \(S_n/A_n\cong\{+1,-1\}\cong\mathbb{Z}_2\), so \([S_n:A_n]=2\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that if \(H\le G\), then \(gHg^{-1}\le G\) and \(H\cong gHg^{-1}\) for all \(g\in G\).
Define \(\phi:H\to gHg^{-1}\) by \(\phi(h)=ghg^{-1}\). Homomorphism: \(\phi(h_1h_2)=g(h_1h_2)g^{-1}=(gh_1g^{-1})(gh_2g^{-1})=\phi(h_1)\phi(h_2)\). Injective: \(\phi(h_1)=\phi(h_2)\Rightarrow h_1=h_2\). Surjective: every element of \(gHg^{-1}\) is \(\phi(h)\) for some \(h\). Hence \(\phi\) is an isomorphism \(H\cong gHg^{-1}\). That \(gHg^{-1}\le G\) follows from it being the image of a subgroup under an inner automorphism. \(\blacksquare\)
Show every nonzero element of \(\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}\) has finite order, but no nonzero element of \(\mathbb{Q}\) has finite order under addition.
In \(\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}\): A coset \(a/b+\mathbb{Z}\) (with \(b>0\)) satisfies \(b\cdot(a/b+\mathbb{Z})=a+\mathbb{Z}=\mathbb{Z}\) (the identity), so the order divides \(b\). Hence every element has finite order. In \(\mathbb{Q}\): Suppose \(q\ne0\) and \(nq=0\) for some \(n\in\mathbb{Z}^+\). Then \(nq=0\) implies \(q=0\) (since \(\mathbb{Q}\) is a field, hence an integral domain). Contradiction. So no nonzero rational has finite order in \((\mathbb{Q},+)\). \(\blacksquare\)
Prove: if \(G/Z(G)\) is cyclic, then \(G\) is abelian.
Let \(G/Z(G)=\langle xZ(G)\rangle\). Every element of \(G\) has the form \(x^m z\) for some \(m\in\mathbb{Z},z\in Z(G)\). Take \(a=x^m z_1,b=x^n z_2\). Then \(ab=(x^m z_1)(x^n z_2)=x^m x^n z_1 z_2\) (since \(z_1\) commutes with everything) \(=x^{m+n}z_1 z_2=x^n x^m z_2 z_1=ba\). So \(G\) is abelian. Corollary: \(G/Z(G)\) is never a nontrivial cyclic group — it is either trivial (G abelian) or non-cyclic. \(\blacksquare\)
State and prove Cauchy's theorem: if prime \(p\) divides \(|G|\), then \(G\) has an element of order \(p\).
Consider \(S=\{(a_1,\ldots,a_p)\in G^p: a_1a_2\cdots a_p=e\}\). Then \(|S|=|G|^{p-1}\) (choose first \(p-1\) freely, last determined). The cyclic group \(\mathbb{Z}_p\) acts on \(S\) by cyclic shift: \(k\cdot(a_1,\ldots,a_p)=(a_{k+1},\ldots,a_p,a_1,\ldots,a_k)\) (this stays in \(S\) since the product is unchanged cyclically). Fixed points are tuples \((a,a,\ldots,a)\) with \(a^p=e\). The tuple \((e,e,\ldots,e)\) is always fixed. Since \(p\mid|G|^{p-1}\) and orbits have size 1 or \(p\), the number of fixed points \(\equiv0\pmod{p}\). At least one fixed point is \((e,\ldots,e)\); since total is \(\equiv0\pmod p\), there exists another fixed point \((a,\ldots,a)\) with \(a\ne e\) and \(a^p=e\). This \(a\) has order \(p\). \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that if \(|G|=p^n\) (\(p\) prime, \(n\ge1\)), then \(Z(G)\ne\{e\}\).
Use the class equation: \(|G|=|Z(G)|+\sum_{[a]\text{ non-central}}[G:C_G(a)]\). Each non-central term \([G:C_G(a)]\) divides \(|G|=p^n\) and is \(>1\), so each is divisible by \(p\). Hence \(p\mid|G|\) and \(p\mid\) each non-central term, so \(p\mid|Z(G)|\). In particular \(|Z(G)|\ge p>1\), so \(Z(G)\ne\{e\}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that \(GL(n,\mathbb{R})\), the set of invertible \(n\times n\) real matrices, is a group under matrix multiplication.
Closure: If \(A,B\) are invertible, then \((AB)^{-1}=B^{-1}A^{-1}\) exists, so \(AB\in GL(n,\mathbb{R})\). Associativity: Matrix multiplication is associative. Identity: \(I_n\in GL(n,\mathbb{R})\) since \(\det(I_n)=1\ne0\). Inverses: If \(A\in GL(n,\mathbb{R})\), then \(A^{-1}\) exists and \(\det(A^{-1})=1/\det(A)\ne0\), so \(A^{-1}\in GL(n,\mathbb{R})\). All axioms satisfied. \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that if \(\phi:G\to H\) is a group homomorphism, then \(\ker(\phi)\) is a normal subgroup of \(G\).
Let \(K=\ker(\phi)=\{g\in G:\phi(g)=e_H\}\). Subgroup: \(\phi(e_G)=e_H\) so \(e_G\in K\). If \(a,b\in K\): \(\phi(ab)=\phi(a)\phi(b)=e_H\), so \(ab\in K\); \(\phi(a^{-1})=\phi(a)^{-1}=e_H^{-1}=e_H\), so \(a^{-1}\in K\). Normal: For any \(g\in G,k\in K\): \(\phi(gkg^{-1})=\phi(g)\phi(k)\phi(g^{-1})=\phi(g)e_H\phi(g)^{-1}=e_H\). So \(gkg^{-1}\in K\), giving \(gKg^{-1}\subseteq K\). Thus \(K\trianglelefteq G\). \(\blacksquare\)
State and prove the First Isomorphism Theorem: \(G/\ker(\phi)\cong\text{Im}(\phi)\).
Let \(\phi:G\to H\) be a homomorphism, \(K=\ker(\phi)\). Define \(\bar\phi:G/K\to\text{Im}(\phi)\) by \(\bar\phi(gK)=\phi(g)\). Well-defined: If \(gK=g'K\), then \(g'^{-1}g\in K\), so \(\phi(g'^{-1}g)=e_H\), so \(\phi(g)=\phi(g')\). Homomorphism: \(\bar\phi((g_1K)(g_2K))=\bar\phi(g_1g_2K)=\phi(g_1g_2)=\phi(g_1)\phi(g_2)=\bar\phi(g_1K)\bar\phi(g_2K)\). Injective: \(\bar\phi(gK)=e_H\Rightarrow\phi(g)=e_H\Rightarrow g\in K\Rightarrow gK=K\) (identity). Surjective: Every \(\phi(g)\in\text{Im}(\phi)\) is \(\bar\phi(gK)\). Hence \(\bar\phi\) is an isomorphism. \(\blacksquare\)
Show that \(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}\cong\mathbb{Z}_n\).
Define \(\phi:\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}_n\) by \(\phi(k)=k\bmod n\). This is a surjective ring (and group) homomorphism. Its kernel is \(\{k\in\mathbb{Z}:k\equiv0\pmod n\}=n\mathbb{Z}\). By the First Isomorphism Theorem, \(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}\cong\text{Im}(\phi)=\mathbb{Z}_n\). Explicitly the cosets are \(0+n\mathbb{Z},1+n\mathbb{Z},\ldots,(n-1)+n\mathbb{Z}\), and addition of cosets mirrors addition mod \(n\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that the dihedral group \(D_n\) has exactly \(2n\) elements and describe its structure.
\(D_n\) is the symmetry group of a regular \(n\)-gon. It consists of \(n\) rotations \(\{r^0,r^1,\ldots,r^{n-1}\}\) where \(r\) is rotation by \(2\pi/n\), and \(n\) reflections \(\{s,sr,sr^2,\ldots,sr^{n-1}\}\) where \(s\) is a fixed reflection. Total: \(2n\) elements. Relations: \(r^n=e\), \(s^2=e\), \(srs^{-1}=r^{-1}\) (i.e., \(sr=r^{-1}s\)). So \(D_n=\langle r,s\mid r^n=s^2=e,\, srs^{-1}=r^{-1}\rangle\). The rotations form a cyclic normal subgroup of index 2. For \(n\ge3\), \(D_n\) is non-abelian. \(\blacksquare\)
Show that \(S_3\) is a non-abelian group of order 6 and list its subgroups.
\(S_3\) consists of all permutations of \(\{1,2,3\}\): \(|S_3|=3!=6\). Elements: \(e,(12),(13),(23),(123),(132)\). Non-abelian: \((12)(13)=(132)\) but \((13)(12)=(123)\ne(132)\). Subgroups: \(\{e\}\) (order 1), \(\{e,(12)\},\{e,(13)\},\{e,(23)\}\) (order 2, three of them), \(\{e,(123),(132)\}=A_3\cong\mathbb{Z}_3\) (order 3), \(S_3\) itself (order 6). Only \(A_3\) and \(S_3\) are normal (and \(\{e\}\)). \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that every subgroup of a cyclic group is cyclic.
Let \(G=\langle a\rangle\) and \(H\le G\). If \(H=\{e\}\), it's cyclic. Otherwise, let \(m\) be the smallest positive integer with \(a^m\in H\). Claim \(H=\langle a^m\rangle\). For any \(a^k\in H\), write \(k=qm+r\) with \(0\le r
Prove that if \(H,K\le G\), then \(HK\le G\) if and only if \(HK=KH\).
(\(\Rightarrow\)) Suppose \(HK\le G\). For any \(kh\in KH\), we have \((kh)^{-1}=h^{-1}k^{-1}\in HK\), and since \(HK\) is a subgroup, \((h^{-1}k^{-1})^{-1}=kh\in HK\). Thus \(KH\subseteq HK\). Similarly \(HK\subseteq KH\), so \(HK=KH\). (\(\Leftarrow\)) Suppose \(HK=KH\). Then \(e=ee\in HK\). For \(h_1k_1,h_2k_2\in HK\): product \(h_1(k_1h_2)k_2\); since \(k_1h_2\in KH=HK\), write it as \(h_3k_3\), giving \(h_1h_3k_3k_2\in HK\). Inverses: \((hk)^{-1}=k^{-1}h^{-1}\in KH=HK\). So \(HK\le G\). \(\blacksquare\)
Write the permutation \((1\,2\,3\,4)(1\,3\,2)\) as a product of disjoint cycles and find its sign.
Compose right-to-left: apply \((1\,3\,2)\) first, then \((1\,2\,3\,4)\). Track each element: \(1\xrightarrow{(132)}3\xrightarrow{(1234)}4\); \(2\xrightarrow{(132)}1\xrightarrow{(1234)}2\); \(3\xrightarrow{(132)}2\xrightarrow{(1234)}3\)... wait, recompute: \(3\xrightarrow{(132)}2\xrightarrow{(1234)}3\). Hmm, let me be careful. \((1\,3\,2)\): \(1\to3,3\to2,2\to1\), fixes 4. \((1\,2\,3\,4)\): \(1\to2,2\to3,3\to4,4\to1\). Composition (left to right = apply \((1\,3\,2)\) then \((1\,2\,3\,4)\)): \(1\to3\to4\); \(2\to1\to2\); \(3\to2\to3\); \(4\to4\to1\). Result: \((1\,4)\), a single transposition. Sign \(= (-1)^1 = -1\) (odd permutation). \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that every permutation in \(S_n\) can be written as a product of disjoint cycles, and this decomposition is unique up to order.
Existence: For \(\sigma\in S_n\), take any \(a_1\in\{1,\ldots,n\}\) and form the orbit \(\{a_1,\sigma(a_1),\sigma^2(a_1),\ldots\}\). Since \(\{1,\ldots,n\}\) is finite, this orbit is finite; say it returns to \(a_1\) after \(k\) steps, giving cycle \((a_1\,\sigma(a_1)\,\cdots\,\sigma^{k-1}(a_1))\). Repeat with elements not yet covered. The resulting cycles are disjoint and their product equals \(\sigma\). Uniqueness: Disjoint cycles commute, and each cycle is determined by the orbit of any of its elements under \(\sigma\), so the partition into orbits is unique. \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that \(A_4\) has no subgroup of order 6.
Suppose \(H\le A_4\) with \(|H|=6\). Then \([A_4:H]=12/6=2\), so \(H\trianglelefteq A_4\). The elements of \(A_4\) of order 2 are the three products of two disjoint transpositions: \((12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23)\); these form the Klein four-group \(V=\{e,(12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23)\}\). Now \(H\) must contain elements whose orders divide 6, but \(A_4\) has 8 elements of order 3 (the 3-cycles). Since \(|H|=6\), \(H\) can contain at most 5 non-identity elements. If \(H\) omits a 3-cycle \(\sigma\), then \(A_4=H\cup\sigma H\) (two cosets). Check: \(A_4\) has exactly 3 elements of order 2; all must be in \(H\) (as \(H\trianglelefteq A_4\) and the conjugates of order-2 elements are order-2). So \(V\subseteq H\). Then \(H\) has the 4 elements of \(V\) plus 2 more (of order 3). But 3-cycles come in inverse pairs: if \(\sigma\in H\), then \(\sigma^2=\sigma^{-1}\in H\). So \(H\) must contain 0 or 2 (paired) 3-cycles. With \(|H|=6\): 4 from \(V\) + 2 from one 3-cycle pair. But the 3-cycles of \(A_4\) split into conjugacy classes of size 4 each; \(H\) cannot contain exactly 2 of them and remain normal (conjugation shuffles all four). Contradiction. Hence no such \(H\) exists. \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that the order of a permutation equals the LCM of the lengths of its disjoint cycles.
Let \(\sigma=c_1c_2\cdots c_r\) (disjoint cycles of lengths \(l_1,\ldots,l_r\)). Disjoint cycles commute, so \(\sigma^k=c_1^k c_2^k\cdots c_r^k\). Now \(\sigma^k=e\iff c_i^k=e\) for all \(i\iff l_i\mid k\) for all \(i\iff\text{lcm}(l_1,\ldots,l_r)\mid k\). The smallest positive such \(k\) is \(\text{lcm}(l_1,\ldots,l_r)\). Hence \(\text{ord}(\sigma)=\text{lcm}(l_1,\ldots,l_r)\). Example: \((1\,2\,3)(4\,5)\in S_5\) has order \(\text{lcm}(3,2)=6\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that the Gaussian integers \(\mathbb{Z}[i]=\{a+bi:a,b\in\mathbb{Z}\}\) form an integral domain.
\(\mathbb{Z}[i]\subset\mathbb{C}\), which is a field, hence an integral domain. More explicitly: \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\) is a commutative ring with unity \(1\). It has no zero divisors: if \((a+bi)(c+di)=0\) in \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\), taking norms \(N(a+bi)N(c+di)=N(0)=0\) where \(N(x+yi)=x^2+y^2\ge0\). Since \(N\) is multiplicative and takes non-negative integer values, \(N(a+bi)=0\) or \(N(c+di)=0\), which forces \(a+bi=0\) or \(c+di=0\). Hence \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\) is an integral domain. \(\blacksquare\)
Find all units in \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\).
An element \(u=a+bi\in\mathbb{Z}[i]\) is a unit iff \(N(u)=a^2+b^2=1\) (since \(N(uv)=N(u)N(v)=1\) requires both factors to be 1 for positive integers). The solutions to \(a^2+b^2=1\) with \(a,b\in\mathbb{Z}\) are \((a,b)\in\{(\pm1,0),(0,\pm1)\}\). So the units are \(\{1,-1,i,-i\}\), forming a cyclic group of order 4 under multiplication. \(\blacksquare\)
Show that \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\) is not a unique factorization domain.
Consider \(6=2\cdot3=(1+\sqrt{-5})(1-\sqrt{-5})\) in \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\). The norm is \(N(a+b\sqrt{-5})=a^2+5b^2\). We have \(N(2)=4,N(3)=9,N(1\pm\sqrt{-5})=6\). Each of \(2,3,1+\sqrt{-5},1-\sqrt{-5}\) is irreducible (their norms have no factorizations into norms of non-units: units have norm 1, and there's no element of norm 2 or 3 since \(a^2+5b^2=2\) or \(3\) has no integer solutions). Yet \(6\) has two distinct factorizations into irreducibles: \(2\cdot3\) and \((1+\sqrt{-5})(1-\sqrt{-5})\). (One checks \(2\nmid(1+\sqrt{-5})\) in this ring.) Hence \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\) is not a UFD. \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that every Euclidean domain is a principal ideal domain.
Let \(R\) be a Euclidean domain with norm \(\nu\), and let \(I\trianglelefteq R\) be a nonzero ideal. Among all nonzero elements of \(I\), pick \(d\) with minimal \(\nu(d)\). Claim \(I=\langle d\rangle\). Clearly \(\langle d\rangle\subseteq I\). For any \(a\in I\), use the Euclidean algorithm: \(a=qd+r\) with \(r=0\) or \(\nu(r)<\nu(d)\). Since \(a,qd\in I\), we have \(r=a-qd\in I\). By minimality of \(\nu(d)\), \(r=0\). So \(a=qd\in\langle d\rangle\), giving \(I=\langle d\rangle\). Hence every ideal is principal. \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that every principal ideal domain is a unique factorization domain.
Existence: Suppose \(a\in R\) is not a unit and not zero. If \(a\) is irreducible, done. Otherwise \(a=a_1b_1\) (non-units). Continue factoring; this terminates because in a PID, ascending chains of ideals \(\langle a\rangle\subseteq\langle a_1\rangle\subseteq\cdots\) must stabilize (PIDs are Noetherian). Uniqueness: In a PID, every irreducible is prime (since \(\langle p\rangle\) is maximal when \(p\) is irreducible — PID implies every nonzero prime ideal is maximal). If \(p\mid ab\), then \(p\mid a\) or \(p\mid b\). Uniqueness of factorization then follows by standard induction on the number of prime factors, using the prime property. \(\blacksquare\)
Show \(\mathbb{Z}[x]\) is a UFD but not a PID.
UFD: \(\mathbb{Z}\) is a UFD, and if \(R\) is a UFD then \(R[x]\) is a UFD (Gauss's theorem). Hence \(\mathbb{Z}[x]\) is a UFD. Not PID: Consider the ideal \(I=\langle 2,x\rangle=\{2f(x)+xg(x):f,g\in\mathbb{Z}[x]\}\). This is the set of polynomials with even constant term. Suppose \(I=\langle h(x)\rangle\). Since \(2\in I\), \(h\mid2\), so \(h\in\{1,-1,2,-2\}\). If \(h=\pm1\), then \(I=\mathbb{Z}[x]\), but \(1\notin I\) (constant term of any element of \(I\) is even). If \(h=\pm2\), then \(I=\langle2\rangle\), but \(x\in I\) and \(x\) is not divisible by 2 in \(\mathbb{Z}[x]\). Contradiction. So \(I\) is not principal, and \(\mathbb{Z}[x]\) is not a PID. \(\blacksquare\)
Use Eisenstein's criterion to show \(f(x)=x^4+4x+2\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\).
Apply Eisenstein with prime \(p=2\): coefficients of \(f(x)=x^4+0\cdot x^3+0\cdot x^2+4x+2\). Check: \(p=2\nmid1\) (leading coefficient); \(2\mid0,2\mid0,2\mid4,2\mid2\) (all non-leading coefficients divisible by 2); \(p^2=4\nmid2\) (constant term not divisible by 4). All Eisenstein conditions satisfied. By Eisenstein's criterion, \(f(x)\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that the characteristic of a field is either 0 or a prime \(p\).
Let \(F\) be a field. The characteristic is the smallest \(n>0\) with \(n\cdot1=0\) (or 0 if no such \(n\) exists). Suppose \(\text{char}(F)=n>0\) and \(n=ab\) with \(1
Prove that \(\mathbb{Z}_p\) is a field if and only if \(p\) is prime.
(\(\Rightarrow\)) If \(\mathbb{Z}_p\) is a field, it has no zero divisors. If \(p=ab\) with \(1
Prove that every ideal of \(\mathbb{Z}\) is of the form \(n\mathbb{Z}\) for some \(n\ge0\).
\(\mathbb{Z}\) is a Euclidean domain (with norm \(\nu(n)=|n|\)), hence a PID, so every ideal is principal: \(I=\langle d\rangle=d\mathbb{Z}\) for some \(d\in\mathbb{Z}\). We can take \(d\ge0\) (since \(\langle d\rangle=\langle -d\rangle\)). Setting \(n=|d|\) gives \(I=n\mathbb{Z}\). The zero ideal is \(0\mathbb{Z}=\{0\}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that every finite integral domain is a field.
Let \(R\) be a finite integral domain and \(a\ne0\). Consider the map \(\phi:R\to R\) defined by \(\phi(r)=ar\). This is injective: if \(ar=as\), then \(a(r-s)=0\), and since \(a\ne0\) and \(R\) has no zero divisors, \(r=s\). An injective map from a finite set to itself is surjective. So there exists \(b\in R\) with \(ab=1\). Hence \(a\) is a unit, and since \(a\) was arbitrary nonzero, \(R\) is a field. \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that an ideal \(M\) of a commutative ring \(R\) is maximal if and only if \(R/M\) is a field.
By the correspondence theorem, ideals of \(R/M\) correspond to ideals of \(R\) containing \(M\). \(M\) is maximal \(\iff\) the only ideals of \(R\) containing \(M\) are \(M\) and \(R\) \(\iff\) the only ideals of \(R/M\) are \(\{0\}\) and \(R/M\) \(\iff\) \(R/M\) has no proper nonzero ideals \(\iff\) \(R/M\) is a field (for commutative rings with unity: a ring is a field iff it has no proper nonzero ideals). \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that an ideal \(P\) of a commutative ring \(R\) is prime if and only if \(R/P\) is an integral domain.
\(P\) prime means: \(ab\in P\Rightarrow a\in P\) or \(b\in P\). In \(R/P\): \((a+P)(b+P)=0+P\iff ab\in P\iff a\in P\) or \(b\in P\iff a+P=0\) or \(b+P=0\). So \(R/P\) has no zero divisors. Also \(R/P\) is commutative with unity \(1+P\ne0+P\) (since \(1\notin P\) for proper prime ideals). Hence \(R/P\) is an integral domain. The converse is the same chain of iff's. \(\blacksquare\)
Show that if \(F\) is a field and \(p(x)\in F[x]\) is irreducible, then \(F[x]/\langle p(x)\rangle\) is a field.
Since \(F\) is a field, \(F[x]\) is a PID. In a PID, an element is irreducible \(\iff\) it generates a maximal ideal (because irreducible \(\Rightarrow\) prime in PID \(\Rightarrow\) prime ideal \(\langle p\rangle\); and for PIDs, prime ideals are maximal among proper ideals). Since \(\langle p(x)\rangle\) is maximal, \(F[x]/\langle p(x)\rangle\) is a field. Concretely: for any nonzero \(f+\langle p\rangle\), since \(\gcd(f,p)=1\) (as \(p\) is irreducible and \(p\nmid f\)), by Bezout in \(F[x]\): \(\exists g,h\) with \(fg+ph=1\), so \((f+\langle p\rangle)(g+\langle p\rangle)=1+\langle p\rangle\). \(\blacksquare\)
Find \(\gcd(11+3i,\,1+8i)\) in \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\) using the Euclidean algorithm.
\(\mathbb{Z}[i]\) is Euclidean with norm \(N\). Divide: \((11+3i)/(1+8i)=(11+3i)(1-8i)/N(1+8i)=(11-88i+3i-24i^2)/(1+64)=(11+24+(3-88)i)/65=(35-85i)/65=(7/13)+(-17/13)i\). Round to nearest Gaussian integer: \(q=1-i\) (since \(7/13\approx0.54\to1\), \(-17/13\approx-1.31\to-1\)). Remainder: \(r=(11+3i)-(1-i)(1+8i)=(11+3i)-(1+8i-i-8i^2)=(11+3i)-(1+8+7i)=(11+3i)-(9+7i)=2-4i\). Now \(\gcd(1+8i,2-4i)\): \((1+8i)/(2-4i)=(1+8i)(2+4i)/(4+16)=(2+4i+16i+32i^2)/20=(2-32+(4+16)i)/20=(-30+20i)/20=-3/2+i\). Round: \(q=-1+i\). Remainder: \(r=(1+8i)-(-1+i)(2-4i)=(1+8i)-(-2+4i+2i-4i^2)=(1+8i)-(-2+4+6i)=(1+8i)+(2-4-6i)=(1+8i)+(-2-6i)=-1+2i\). Continue: \(\gcd(2-4i,-1+2i)\): \((2-4i)/(-1+2i)=(2-4i)(-1-2i)/(1+4)=(-2-4i+4i+8i^2)/5=(-2-8)/5=-2\). Exact: \(q=-2\), \(r=(2-4i)-(-2)(-1+2i)=(2-4i)-(2-4i)=0\). So \(\gcd=|-1+2i|=\sqrt5\), i.e., \(\gcd=1-2i\) (or associate \(-1+2i\)). Verify: \(N(-1+2i)=5\), and \(N(11+3i)=130=5\cdot26\), \(N(1+8i)=65=5\cdot13\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that 2 is not prime in \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\) and find its factorization into primes.
In \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\): \(2=(1+i)(1-i)\). Check: \((1+i)(1-i)=1-i^2=1+1=2\). \(N(1+i)=1^2+1^2=2\), which is prime in \(\mathbb{Z}\). In a Euclidean domain, an element with prime norm is itself prime (irreducible). So \(1+i\) is a Gaussian prime. Note \(1-i=-i(1+i)\), so \(1-i\) is an associate of \(1+i\). Thus \(2=-i(1+i)^2\) (up to units). The rational prime 2 ramifies in \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\) (it becomes a square of a prime times a unit). Since 2 is not irreducible in \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\), it is not prime there. \(\blacksquare\)
State the class equation \(|G|=|Z(G)|+\sum [G:C_G(a)]\) and use it for a group of order \(p^2\).
G acts on itself by conjugation. The orbits are conjugacy classes. Elements of \(Z(G)\) form singleton classes. For \(a\notin Z(G)\), the class size is \([G:C_G(a)]>1\). So \(|G|=|Z(G)|+\sum_{[a]\text{ non-central}}[G:C_G(a)]\). For \(|G|=p^2\): Each non-central term divides \(p^2\) and is \(>1\), so divisible by \(p\). Thus \(p\mid|Z(G)|\), so \(|Z(G)|\in\{p,p^2\}\). If \(|Z(G)|=p\), then \(|G/Z(G)|=p\), so \(G/Z(G)\) is cyclic, hence \(G\) is abelian (standard result), contradicting \(|Z(G)|=p
Find all conjugacy classes of \(S_4\) and their sizes.
Conjugacy classes in \(S_n\) correspond to cycle types. For \(S_4\) (\(|S_4|=24\)): (1) Identity \(e\): cycle type \((1)(1)(1)(1)\), size 1. (2) Transpositions \((ab)\): cycle type \(2+1+1\), count \(\binom{4}{2}=6\). (3) 3-cycles \((abc)\): cycle type \(3+1\), count \(\frac{4\cdot3\cdot2}{3}=8\). (4) 4-cycles \((abcd)\): cycle type \(4\), count \(\frac{4!}{4}=6\). (5) Products of two disjoint transpositions \((ab)(cd)\): cycle type \(2+2\), count \(\frac{1}{2}\binom{4}{2}\binom{2}{2}=3\). Total: \(1+6+8+6+3=24\). ✓ Five conjugacy classes. \(\blacksquare\)
State Sylow's First Theorem and outline its proof.
Statement: If \(p^k\mid|G|\), then \(G\) has a subgroup of order \(p^k\). In particular, for \(p^n\parallel|G|\) (highest power), there exists a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of order \(p^n\). Proof sketch: Let \(|G|=p^n m\) with \(p\nmid m\). Consider \(\mathcal{S}=\{S\subseteq G:|S|=p^n\}\), acted on by \(G\) by left multiplication. \(|\mathcal{S}|=\binom{p^n m}{p^n}\). One shows \(p\nmid|\mathcal{S}|\) (by Lucas' theorem or direct computation). So some orbit has size not divisible by \(p\). If \(S\) is in such an orbit, its stabilizer \(G_S=\{g:gS=S\}\) has \(|G_S|=|G|/|\text{orbit}|\). Analysis shows \(|G_S|=p^n\), so \(G_S\) is a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup. \(\blacksquare\)
State and prove Sylow's Second Theorem: all Sylow \(p\)-subgroups are conjugate.
Statement: Any two Sylow \(p\)-subgroups \(P,Q\) of \(G\) are conjugate: \(Q=gPg^{-1}\) for some \(g\in G\). Proof: Let \(P\) act on the set of left cosets \(G/Q\) by left multiplication. The number of fixed points \(\equiv|G/Q|\pmod p\). Since \(|G/Q|=[G:Q]=m\) (the \(p'\)-part of \(|G|\)), \(p\nmid m\), so there is at least one fixed point: some coset \(gQ\) with \(P\cdot gQ=gQ\), i.e., \(p\cdot gQ=gQ\) for all \(p\in P\), meaning \(g^{-1}Pg\subseteq Q\). Since \(|g^{-1}Pg|=|P|=|Q|=p^n\), we get \(g^{-1}Pg=Q\), i.e., \(Q=gPg^{-1}\). \(\blacksquare\)
State Sylow's Third Theorem: \(n_p\equiv 1\pmod p\) and \(n_p\mid m\).
Let \(|G|=p^n m\), \(p\nmid m\). Let \(n_p\) = number of Sylow \(p\)-subgroups. \(n_p\mid m\): \(G\) acts on Sylow \(p\)-subgroups by conjugation; the action is transitive (Second Theorem). So \(n_p=[G:N_G(P)]\). Since \(P\subseteq N_G(P)\), we have \(|N_G(P)|\ge p^n\), so \(n_p=[G:N_G(P)]\le m\). Also \(n_p\mid|G|\); combined with the fact that \(n_p\mid m\) follows from \(n_p=[G:N_G(P)]\) and \(p^n\mid|N_G(P)|\). \(n_p\equiv1\pmod p\): Let \(P\) act on the set of all Sylow \(p\)-subgroups by conjugation. The fixed points are Sylow subgroups \(Q\) normalized by \(P\). One shows the only such \(Q\) is \(P\) itself (if \(P\) normalizes \(Q\), then \(PQ\) is a subgroup; \(|PQ|=|P||Q|/|P\cap Q|\) is a power of \(p\) contained in \(G\), forcing \(P=Q\)). So there's exactly 1 fixed point, and \(n_p=|\text{fixed points}|+\text{(sum of orbit sizes}\ge2)\equiv 1\pmod p\). \(\blacksquare\)
Classify all groups of order 15.
\(15=3\cdot5\). Let \(n_3\) = number of Sylow 3-subgroups: \(n_3\equiv1\pmod3\) and \(n_3\mid5\), so \(n_3\in\{1,5\}\). Let \(n_5\) = number of Sylow 5-subgroups: \(n_5\equiv1\pmod5\) and \(n_5\mid3\), so \(n_5=1\). So there's a unique (hence normal) Sylow 5-subgroup \(P_5\cong\mathbb{Z}_5\). If \(n_3=5\), count elements: 5 subgroups of order 3 contribute \(5\times2=10\) elements of order 3, plus 4 elements of order 5 from \(P_5\), plus identity = 15. But then no room for the 5 Sylow 3-subgroups to not overlap, contradiction. So \(n_3=1\), giving unique normal \(P_3\cong\mathbb{Z}_3\). Then \(G=P_3\times P_5\cong\mathbb{Z}_3\times\mathbb{Z}_5\cong\mathbb{Z}_{15}\). All groups of order 15 are cyclic. \(\blacksquare\)
List all groups of order 8 up to isomorphism.
There are exactly 5 groups of order \(8=2^3\): (1) \(\mathbb{Z}_8\) — cyclic, has element of order 8. (2) \(\mathbb{Z}_4\times\mathbb{Z}_2\) — has element of order 4 but not 8; two elements of order 2. (3) \(\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2\) — elementary abelian, all non-identity elements have order 2. (4) \(D_4\) — dihedral group of square; non-abelian, has element of order 4. (5) \(Q_8=\{\pm1,\pm i,\pm j,\pm k\}\) — quaternion group; non-abelian, unique element of order 2, all non-identity elements have order 4. Distinguished: \(D_4\) has non-normal subgroup of order 2; \(Q_8\) has all subgroups normal. \(\blacksquare\)
Classify all groups of order 12 up to isomorphism.
\(12=4\cdot3=2^2\cdot3\). Sylow analysis: \(n_3\in\{1,4\}\). If \(n_3=4\), counting gives 8 elements of order 3 plus at least 4 from Sylow 2-subgroups — exactly 12, forcing unique Sylow 2-subgroup. Five groups of order 12: (1) \(\mathbb{Z}_{12}\cong\mathbb{Z}_4\times\mathbb{Z}_3\) (cyclic). (2) \(\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_6\cong\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_3\) (abelian, non-cyclic). (3) \(D_6\cong D_3\times\mathbb{Z}_2\cong S_3\times\mathbb{Z}_2\) (dihedral of hexagon). (4) \(A_4\) (alternating group; \(n_3=4\), no subgroup of order 6). (5) \(\text{Dic}_3\cong\mathbb{Z}_3\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_4\) (dicyclic group). \(\blacksquare\)
Prove that every group of order \(p^2\) (\(p\) prime) is abelian.
By the class equation argument (see PYQ 2024 above): \(G\) is a \(p\)-group so \(Z(G)\ne\{e\}\) (non-trivial center). \(|Z(G)|\in\{p,p^2\}\). If \(|Z(G)|=p^2\), then \(G=Z(G)\) is abelian. If \(|Z(G)|=p\), then \(|G/Z(G)|=p\), so \(G/Z(G)\) is cyclic. But \(G/Z(G)\) cyclic implies \(G\) abelian (standard lemma), contradicting \(|Z(G)|=p
State the Jordan-Hölder theorem on composition series.
A composition series of \(G\) is a chain \(G=G_0\supset G_1\supset\cdots\supset G_r=\{e\}\) where each \(G_{i+1}\trianglelefteq G_i\) and \(G_i/G_{i+1}\) is simple (the composition factors). Jordan-Hölder Theorem: Any two composition series of a finite group \(G\) have the same length \(r\), and the multisets of composition factors are the same (up to isomorphism and reordering). Example: For \(\mathbb{Z}_{12}\): \(\mathbb{Z}_{12}\supset\langle2\rangle\supset\langle4\rangle\supset\{0\}\) with factors \(\mathbb{Z}_2,\mathbb{Z}_2,\mathbb{Z}_3\); or \(\mathbb{Z}_{12}\supset\langle4\rangle\supset\{0\}\) is not a composition series (not maximal at first step). The theorem guarantees the factors \(\{\mathbb{Z}_2,\mathbb{Z}_2,\mathbb{Z}_3\}\) appear in any composition series. \(\blacksquare\)
Define solvable groups and state the Feit-Thompson theorem.
A group \(G\) is solvable if it has a subnormal series \(G=G_0\supset G_1\supset\cdots\supset G_r=\{e\}\) with each quotient \(G_i/G_{i+1}\) abelian. Equivalently, the derived series \(G^{(0)}=G,G^{(1)}=G'=[G,G],G^{(2)}=[G',G'],\ldots\) eventually reaches \(\{e\}\). Feit-Thompson Theorem (1963): Every group of odd order is solvable. This is one of the deepest results in group theory (proof spans 255 pages). Consequence: every non-abelian simple group has even order (hence has an element of order 2 by Cauchy). \(\blacksquare\)
Define the derived series of a group and show every abelian group is solvable.
The commutator subgroup \(G'=[G,G]=\langle aba^{-1}b^{-1}:a,b\in G\rangle\). The derived series is \(G^{(0)}=G\supset G^{(1)}=G'\supset G^{(2)}=(G')'\supset\cdots\). Each \(G^{(i+1)}\trianglelefteq G^{(i)}\) with abelian quotient \(G^{(i)}/G^{(i+1)}\). \(G\) is solvable \(\iff\) \(G^{(n)}=\{e\}\) for some \(n\). Abelian \(\Rightarrow\) solvable: If \(G\) is abelian, \(G'=[G,G]=\{e\}\) (every commutator \(aba^{-1}b^{-1}=e\)). So \(G^{(1)}=\{e\}\) and the derived series terminates at step 1. \(\blacksquare\)
Write a composition series for \(S_3\) and identify the composition factors.
\(S_3\supset A_3\supset\{e\}\). Check: \(A_3=\{e,(123),(132)\}\cong\mathbb{Z}_3\), normal in \(S_3\) (index 2). \(\{e\}\trianglelefteq A_3\). Factors: \(S_3/A_3\cong\mathbb{Z}_2\) (simple); \(A_3/\{e\}\cong\mathbb{Z}_3\) (simple). Both are simple (prime cyclic groups are simple). So the composition series is \(S_3\supset A_3\supset\{e\}\) with factors \(\{\mathbb{Z}_2,\mathbb{Z}_3\}\). Since \(S_3\) is solvable (its derived series: \(S_3'=A_3\), \(A_3'=\{e\}\)), this is consistent. \(\blacksquare\)
Prove every abelian group is solvable using the definition via abelian series.
A group \(G\) is solvable if there exists a chain \(G=G_0\supset G_1\supset\cdots\supset G_r=\{e\}\) with each \(G_{i+1}\trianglelefteq G_i\) and each quotient \(G_i/G_{i+1}\) abelian. If \(G\) is abelian, take the trivial chain \(G\supset\{e\}\): the single quotient \(G/\{e\}\cong G\) is abelian. This is a solvable series of length 1. So \(G\) is solvable. \(\blacksquare\)
Prove \(\mathbb{Z}_m\times\mathbb{Z}_n\cong\mathbb{Z}_{mn}\) if and only if \(\gcd(m,n)=1\).
(\(\Leftarrow\)) If \(\gcd(m,n)=1\), consider \((1,1)\in\mathbb{Z}_m\times\mathbb{Z}_n\). Its order is \(\text{lcm}(m,n)=mn/\gcd(m,n)=mn\). So \(\mathbb{Z}_m\times\mathbb{Z}_n\) has an element of order \(mn=|\mathbb{Z}_m\times\mathbb{Z}_n|\), hence is cyclic \(\cong\mathbb{Z}_{mn}\). (\(\Rightarrow\)) If \(\gcd(m,n)=d>1\), then every element \((a,b)\in\mathbb{Z}_m\times\mathbb{Z}_n\) satisfies \((mn/d)(a,b)=((mn/d)a\bmod m,\,(mn/d)b\bmod n)=(0,0)\) (since \(m\mid mn/d\) and \(n\mid mn/d\)). So every element has order dividing \(mn/d
Define the free group \(F_2\) on two generators and state its key property.
The free group \(F_2=F(\{a,b\})\) consists of all reduced words in letters \(a,a^{-1},b,b^{-1}\) (no consecutive cancellation), with multiplication by concatenation and reduction. Universal property: For any group \(G\) and any function \(f:\{a,b\}\to G\), there exists a unique group homomorphism \(\phi:F_2\to G\) extending \(f\). Every group is a quotient of a free group (by the universal property applied to a generating set). \(F_2\) is infinite and non-abelian; it contains free subgroups of all countable ranks. Abelianization: \(F_2/[F_2,F_2]\cong\mathbb{Z}^2\). \(\blacksquare\)
State Burnside's lemma and apply it to count the number of distinct necklaces with 3 beads of 2 colors.
Burnside's Lemma: If a finite group \(G\) acts on a finite set \(X\), the number of orbits is \(\frac{1}{|G|}\sum_{g\in G}|X^g|\), where \(X^g=\{x\in X:gx=x\}\). Application: \(X\) = colorings of 3 beads with 2 colors (8 total). \(G=\mathbb{Z}_3\) (rotations). \(X^{r^0}=8\) (identity fixes all). \(X^{r^1}=\{$ colorings fixed by rotation by $120°\}$: all 3 beads same color, so 2. \(X^{r^2}=2\) similarly. Orbits \(= (8+2+2)/3=12/3=4\). The 4 distinct necklaces are: (RRR), (BBB), (RRB), (RBB) — where R=red, B=blue. \(\blacksquare\)
Determine the automorphism group \(\text{Aut}(\mathbb{Z}_n)\).
An automorphism \(\phi:\mathbb{Z}_n\to\mathbb{Z}_n\) is determined by \(\phi(1)=k\) where \(\gcd(k,n)=1\) (since \(\phi(1)\) must generate \(\mathbb{Z}_n\)). Conversely, for each \(k\) with \(\gcd(k,n)=1\), the map \(1\mapsto k\) extends to an automorphism \(m\mapsto km\bmod n\). Composition corresponds to multiplication: \(\phi_k\circ\phi_l=\phi_{kl\bmod n}\). Hence \(\text{Aut}(\mathbb{Z}_n)\cong(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})^\times\), the multiplicative group of units mod \(n\), of order \(\phi(n)\) (Euler's totient). For prime \(p\): \(\text{Aut}(\mathbb{Z}_p)\cong\mathbb{Z}_{p-1}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that the inner automorphisms \(\text{Inn}(G)\) form a normal subgroup of \(\text{Aut}(G)\), and \(\text{Inn}(G)\cong G/Z(G)\).
For each \(a\in G\), define \(\iota_a:G\to G\) by \(\iota_a(g)=aga^{-1}\). Then \(\iota_a\in\text{Aut}(G)\) (conjugation is an automorphism). \(\text{Inn}(G)=\{\iota_a:a\in G\}\). Subgroup: \(\iota_a\iota_b=\iota_{ab}\), \((\iota_a)^{-1}=\iota_{a^{-1}}\), \(\text{id}=\iota_e\). Normal in Aut(G): For \(\phi\in\text{Aut}(G)\): \(\phi\iota_a\phi^{-1}(g)=\phi(a\phi^{-1}(g)a^{-1})=\phi(a)g\phi(a)^{-1}=\iota_{\phi(a)}(g)\). So \(\phi\iota_a\phi^{-1}=\iota_{\phi(a)}\in\text{Inn}(G)\). Isomorphism: The map \(G\to\text{Inn}(G)\), \(a\mapsto\iota_a\), is a surjective homomorphism with kernel \(Z(G)\). By First Isomorphism Theorem: \(\text{Inn}(G)\cong G/Z(G)\). \(\blacksquare\)
Define simple groups. Show \(\mathbb{Z}_p\) is simple and \(A_5\) is simple.
A group \(G\) is simple if its only normal subgroups are \(\{e\}\) and \(G\) itself. \(\mathbb{Z}_p\) is simple: \(\mathbb{Z}_p\) has order \(p\) (prime), so by Lagrange, its only subgroups have order 1 or \(p\). In an abelian group, every subgroup is normal. Hence the only normal subgroups are \(\{0\}\) and \(\mathbb{Z}_p\). \(A_5\) is simple: \(|A_5|=60\). The conjugacy classes of \(A_5\) (as permutations of 5 elements) have sizes 1, 15, 20, 12, 12. Any normal subgroup is a union of conjugacy classes containing \(e\), so its order divides 60 and is a sum of 1 and some subset of \(\{15,20,12,12\}\). The only sums dividing 60 are 1 (just \(\{e\}\)) and 60 (all). Hence \(A_5\) is simple. It is the smallest non-abelian simple group. \(\blacksquare\)
Show that \([\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}):\mathbb{Q}]=2\).
\(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})=\{a+b\sqrt{2}:a,b\in\mathbb{Q}\}\). The minimal polynomial of \(\sqrt{2}\) over \(\mathbb{Q}\) is \(m(x)=x^2-2\), which is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\) (no rational roots: \(\pm1,\pm2\) fail). Since \(m\) is irreducible of degree 2, \([\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}):\mathbb{Q}]=\deg(m)=2\). A \(\mathbb{Q}\)-basis for \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})\) is \(\{1,\sqrt{2}\}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show that \([\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}):\mathbb{Q}]=4\).
Let \(\alpha=\sqrt[4]{2}=2^{1/4}\). The minimal polynomial of \(\alpha\) over \(\mathbb{Q}\) is \(m(x)=x^4-2\). This is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\) by Eisenstein's criterion with \(p=2\): \(2\nmid1\), \(2\mid0,0,0,-2\), \(4\nmid-2\). Wait: \(4\nmid 2\) ✓. So \(x^4-2\) is irreducible of degree 4, giving \([\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}]=4\). Basis: \(\{1,\alpha,\alpha^2,\alpha^3\}=\{1,2^{1/4},\sqrt{2},2^{3/4}\}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Show the splitting field of \(x^2+1\) over \(\mathbb{Q}\) is \(\mathbb{Q}(i)\) with degree 2.
The roots of \(x^2+1\) are \(\pm i\). The splitting field is the smallest field containing \(\mathbb{Q}\) and all roots: \(\mathbb{Q}(i,{-i})=\mathbb{Q}(i)\) (since \(-i=0-i\in\mathbb{Q}(i)\)). The minimal polynomial of \(i\) over \(\mathbb{Q}\) is \(x^2+1\), irreducible (no real rational roots). So \([\mathbb{Q}(i):\mathbb{Q}]=2\). Basis: \(\{1,i\}\). As a field: \(\mathbb{Q}(i)\cong\mathbb{Q}[x]/\langle x^2+1\rangle\). \(\blacksquare\)
Define the algebraic closure \(\bar{F}\) of a field \(F\) and state its key properties.
A field \(\bar{F}\) is the algebraic closure of \(F\) if: (1) \(F\subseteq\bar{F}\) (or \(F\) embeds in \(\bar{F}\)); (2) \(\bar{F}\) is algebraic over \(F\) (every element of \(\bar{F}\) is algebraic over \(F\)); (3) \(\bar{F}\) is algebraically closed: every non-constant polynomial in \(\bar{F}[x]\) has a root in \(\bar{F}\). Equivalently: every polynomial in \(F[x]\) splits completely in \(\bar{F}[x]\). Existence and uniqueness: Every field has an algebraic closure, unique up to \(F\)-isomorphism (Steinitz). Examples: \(\bar{\mathbb{Q}}\) = algebraic numbers; \(\overline{\mathbb{F}_p}\) = algebraic closure of finite field; \(\bar{\mathbb{R}}=\mathbb{C}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Find the minimal polynomial of \(\alpha=\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}\) over \(\mathbb{Q}\) and show \([\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}]=4\).
\(\alpha=\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}\). Then \(\alpha^2=5+2\sqrt{6}\), so \(\alpha^2-5=2\sqrt{6}\), so \((\alpha^2-5)^2=24\), giving \(\alpha^4-10\alpha^2+25=24\), i.e., \(\alpha^4-10\alpha^2+1=0\). So \(m(x)=x^4-10x^2+1\). Irreducibility: check \(m\) has no rational roots (\(\pm1\) fail) and does not factor into two quadratics over \(\mathbb{Q}\): if \(m=(x^2+ax+b)(x^2-ax+c)\) then expanding: \(a=0\) (coefficient of \(x^3\) is 0), \(b+c-a^2=-10\), so \(b+c=-10\), and \(bc=1\), but \(b+c=-10,bc=1\) gives \(b,c=(-10\pm\sqrt{96})/2\notin\mathbb{Q}\). So \(m\) is irreducible of degree 4, and \([\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}]=4\). \(\blacksquare\)
State the classification of finite fields: there exists a field of order \(p^n\) for each prime \(p\) and \(n\ge1\), unique up to isomorphism.
Existence: The splitting field of \(x^{p^n}-x\) over \(\mathbb{F}_p\) has exactly \(p^n\) elements (the roots of \(x^{p^n}-x\) are distinct — derivative is \(-1\ne0\) — and form a field). Uniqueness: Any field of order \(p^n\) has characteristic \(p\), so contains \(\mathbb{F}_p\). Every element \(\alpha\) satisfies \(\alpha^{p^n}=\alpha\) (multiplicative group has order \(p^n-1\)). So every element is a root of \(x^{p^n}-x\), meaning the field is the splitting field of \(x^{p^n}-x\) over \(\mathbb{F}_p\). Splitting fields are unique up to isomorphism. We write \(\text{GF}(p^n)=\mathbb{F}_{p^n}\). \(\blacksquare\)
Find the number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree \(n\) over \(\mathbb{F}_p\).
Let \(N(n)\) = number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree \(n\) over \(\mathbb{F}_p\). Since \(x^{p^n}-x=\prod_{d\mid n}\prod_{f\text{ irred, deg }d}f(x)\) in \(\mathbb{F}_p[x]\), taking degrees: \(p^n=\sum_{d\mid n}d\cdot N(d)\). By Möbius inversion: \(N(n)=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{d\mid n}\mu(n/d)p^d\), where \(\mu\) is the Möbius function. For \(n=1\): \(N(1)=p\). For \(n=2\): \(N(2)=(p^2-p)/2=p(p-1)/2\). For prime \(n=q\): \(N(q)=(p^q-p)/q\). \(\blacksquare\)
State the result that \(\text{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2},i)/\mathbb{Q})\cong D_4\) and describe the generators.
The splitting field of \(x^4-2\) over \(\mathbb{Q}\) is \(L=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2},i)\) (roots are \(\pm\sqrt[4]{2},\pm i\sqrt[4]{2}\)). We have \([L:\mathbb{Q}]=8\). The Galois group \(G=\text{Gal}(L/\mathbb{Q})\) has \(|G|=[L:\mathbb{Q}]=8\). The two generators are: \(\sigma:\sqrt[4]{2}\mapsto i\sqrt[4]{2},\, i\mapsto i\) (rotation of roots, order 4); \(\tau:\sqrt[4]{2}\mapsto\sqrt[4]{2},\, i\mapsto -i\) (complex conjugation, order 2). They satisfy \(\tau\sigma\tau^{-1}=\sigma^{-1}\), so \(G=\langle\sigma,\tau\rangle\cong D_4\). \(\blacksquare\)
State the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory.
Let \(L/F\) be a finite Galois extension with Galois group \(G=\text{Gal}(L/F)\). There is an inclusion-reversing bijection (the Galois correspondence): \[\{\text{intermediate fields } F\subseteq K\subseteq L\}\longleftrightarrow\{\text{subgroups } H\le G\}\] given by \(K\mapsto\text{Gal}(L/K)\) and \(H\mapsto L^H\) (fixed field). Under this correspondence: (1) \([L:K]=|H|\) and \([K:F]=[G:H]\). (2) \(K/F\) is Galois \(\iff\) \(H\trianglelefteq G\), and then \(\text{Gal}(K/F)\cong G/H\). (3) Lattice of subfields reverses the lattice of subgroups. \(\blacksquare\)
State the theorem connecting solvability by radicals and solvable Galois groups.
Theorem (Galois): A polynomial \(f(x)\in\mathbb{Q}[x]\) is solvable by radicals (its roots can be expressed using \(+,-,\times,\div\) and \(n\)th root operations) if and only if its Galois group \(\text{Gal}(f)\) (= Galois group of its splitting field over \(\mathbb{Q}\)) is a solvable group. Consequence: The general quintic \(x^5-5x+1\) has Galois group \(S_5\), which is not solvable (since \(A_5\) is simple non-abelian, making the derived series not terminate). Hence the general degree 5 polynomial is not solvable by radicals — no quintic formula exists. \(\blacksquare\)
Prove every extension of degree 2 over a field of characteristic \(\ne2\) is Galois.
Let \([K:F]=2\) and \(\text{char}(F)\ne2\). Pick \(\alpha\in K\setminus F\); then \(\{1,\alpha\}\) is a basis of \(K/F\). The minimal polynomial of \(\alpha\) over \(F\) has degree 2: \(m(x)=x^2+bx+c\in F[x]\). Complete the square: \(\alpha=-b/2+\beta\) where \(\beta=\alpha+b/2\) satisfies \(\beta^2=(b/2)^2-c=d\in F\). So \(K=F(\beta)\) and \(\beta^2=d\). The splitting field of \(x^2-d\) over \(F\) is \(F(\beta)\) (both roots \(\pm\beta\in F(\beta)\) since char\(\ne2\)). A splitting field of a separable polynomial is Galois. Hence \(K/F\) is Galois with \(\text{Gal}(K/F)\cong\mathbb{Z}_2\). \(\blacksquare\)
Define normal extension and give an example of a non-normal extension.
An algebraic extension \(K/F\) is normal if every irreducible polynomial \(f\in F[x]\) that has at least one root in \(K\) splits completely in \(K[x]\). Equivalently: \(K\) is a splitting field of some family of polynomials over \(F\). Non-normal example: \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{2})/\mathbb{Q}\). The minimal polynomial \(x^3-2\) has one real root \(\sqrt[3]{2}\in\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{2})\) but the other roots \(\sqrt[3]{2}\omega,\sqrt[3]{2}\omega^2\) (where \(\omega=e^{2\pi i/3}\)) are complex and not in \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{2})\subset\mathbb{R}\). So \(x^3-2\) does not split completely in \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{2})\). \(\blacksquare\)
Define separable extension and separable polynomial. State when finite fields give separable extensions.
A polynomial \(f\in F[x]\) is separable if it has no repeated roots in its splitting field (equivalently, \(\gcd(f,f')=1\)). An algebraic element \(\alpha\) over \(F\) is separable if its minimal polynomial is separable. An algebraic extension \(K/F\) is separable if every element of \(K\) is separable over \(F\). Finite fields: Every extension of finite fields \(\mathbb{F}_{p^n}/\mathbb{F}_p\) is separable (and Galois). The Frobenius \(\phi:\alpha\mapsto\alpha^p\) generates \(\text{Gal}(\mathbb{F}_{p^n}/\mathbb{F}_p)\cong\mathbb{Z}_n\). Over fields of characteristic 0 (like \(\mathbb{Q}\)), every algebraic extension is separable (since \(f'=0\) only if \(f=0\) in char 0). \(\blacksquare\)
Define the cyclotomic polynomial \(\Phi_n(x)\) and show \(\Phi_p(x)=1+x+\cdots+x^{p-1}\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\).
\(\Phi_n(x)=\prod_{\substack{1\le k\le n\\\gcd(k,n)=1}}(x-e^{2\pi ik/n})\), the product over primitive \(n\)th roots of unity. It has degree \(\phi(n)\) (Euler's totient) and integer coefficients. For prime \(p\): \(\Phi_p(x)=(x^p-1)/(x-1)=x^{p-1}+\cdots+x+1\). Irreducibility: substitute \(x=y+1\): \(\Phi_p(y+1)=\frac{(y+1)^p-1}{y}=y^{p-1}+\binom{p}{1}y^{p-2}+\cdots+\binom{p}{p-1}\). Apply Eisenstein with prime \(p\): leading coeff 1 (not div by \(p\)), all others \(\binom{p}{k}\) for \(1\le k\le p-1\) are divisible by \(p\), constant term \(\binom{p}{p-1}=p\) not divisible by \(p^2\). So \(\Phi_p(y+1)\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\), hence \(\Phi_p(x)\) is irreducible. \(\blacksquare\)
Find \(\text{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{2},\omega)/\mathbb{Q})\) where \(\omega=e^{2\pi i/3}\).
The splitting field of \(x^3-2\) over \(\mathbb{Q}\) is \(L=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{2},\omega)\) (roots: \(\sqrt[3]{2},\sqrt[3]{2}\omega,\sqrt[3]{2}\omega^2\)). \([L:\mathbb{Q}]=6\) (since \([\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{2}):\mathbb{Q}]=3\) and \([L:\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{2})]=2\)). So \(|G|=6\). The two generators: \(\sigma:\sqrt[3]{2}\mapsto\sqrt[3]{2}\omega,\,\omega\mapsto\omega\) (order 3); \(\tau:\sqrt[3]{2}\mapsto\sqrt[3]{2},\,\omega\mapsto\omega^2\) (order 2, complex conjugation on \(\omega\)). One computes \(\tau\sigma\tau^{-1}=\sigma^{-1}\). So \(G=\langle\sigma,\tau\rangle\cong S_3\cong D_3\). \(\blacksquare\)
For the extension \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})/\mathbb{Q}\), draw the lattice of subfields and corresponding subgroups.
\(L=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt2,\sqrt3)\), \([L:\mathbb{Q}]=4\). Galois group \(G=\text{Gal}(L/\mathbb{Q})\cong\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2\) with generators: \(\sigma:\sqrt2\mapsto-\sqrt2,\sqrt3\mapsto\sqrt3\); \(\tau:\sqrt2\mapsto\sqrt2,\sqrt3\mapsto-\sqrt3\). Subgroups of \(G\): \(\{e\},\langle\sigma\rangle,\langle\tau\rangle,\langle\sigma\tau\rangle,G\). Fixed fields (by Galois correspondence): \(L^{\{e\}}=L\); \(L^{\langle\sigma\rangle}=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt3)\); \(L^{\langle\tau\rangle}=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt2)\); \(L^{\langle\sigma\tau\rangle}=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt6)\) (\(\sigma\tau\) sends \(\sqrt6\mapsto(-\sqrt2)(-\sqrt3)=\sqrt6\)); \(L^G=\mathbb{Q}\). The lattice of subfields is the reverse of the lattice of subgroups. \(\blacksquare\)
Show that \(\mathbb{Z}\)-modules are exactly abelian groups.
A \(\mathbb{Z}\)-module \(M\) is an abelian group \((M,+)\) together with scalar multiplication \(\mathbb{Z}\times M\to M\) satisfying the module axioms. But for abelian groups, the action of \(n\in\mathbb{Z}\) on \(m\in M\) is forced: \(n\cdot m=m+m+\cdots+m\) (\(n\) times) for \(n>0\), \(0\cdot m=0\), \(n\cdot m=-(|n|\cdot m)\) for \(n<0\). This is the unique \(\mathbb{Z}\)-module structure on any abelian group, and it satisfies all module axioms. Conversely, any \(\mathbb{Z}\)-module is an abelian group. Hence \(\mathbb{Z}\text{-Mod}=\text{Ab}\) (category equivalence). \(\blacksquare\)
Define a free module of rank \(n\) over a ring \(R\) and give key properties.
A free \(R\)-module of rank \(n\) is \(R^n=R\oplus R\oplus\cdots\oplus R\) (\(n\) copies), or equivalently any \(R\)-module with a basis of \(n\) elements (a linearly independent spanning set). Universal property: For any \(R\)-module \(M\) and any set map from a basis \(\{e_1,\ldots,e_n\}\) to \(M\), there is a unique \(R\)-module homomorphism \(R^n\to M\) extending it. Every \(R\)-module is a quotient of a free module. For commutative rings, any two bases of a free module have the same cardinality (invariant basis number property), so rank is well-defined. \(\blacksquare\)
State the structure theorem and classify \(\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_4\oplus\mathbb{Z}\) vs \(\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_4\).
Theorem: Every finitely generated abelian group \(G\) is isomorphic to \(\mathbb{Z}^r\oplus\mathbb{Z}_{d_1}\oplus\cdots\oplus\mathbb{Z}_{d_k}\) where \(r\ge0\) (free rank), \(d_1\mid d_2\mid\cdots\mid d_k\ge2\) (invariant factors). This decomposition is unique. Comparison: \(\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_4\oplus\mathbb{Z}\): torsion part \(\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_4\) (invariant factors 2,4 since \(2\mid4\)), free rank 1. \(\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_4\): invariant factors would need \(d_1\mid d_2\mid d_3\); \(\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_4\cong\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus(\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_4)\). Since \(2\mid4\), the invariant form is \(\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_{4}\oplus...\) — actually \(\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_4\) in primary decomposition has different structure from \(\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_4\), so they are not isomorphic. \(\blacksquare\)
State the primary decomposition theorem and apply it to classify all abelian groups of order 36.
Primary Decomposition: Every finite abelian group \(G\) is isomorphic to a direct sum of cyclic groups of prime power order: \(G\cong\mathbb{Z}_{p_1^{a_1}}\oplus\cdots\oplus\mathbb{Z}_{p_k^{a_k}}\). This is unique up to reordering. Order 36 = 4 · 9 = 2² · 3²: The abelian groups of order 36 correspond to partitions of the exponent at each prime: For \(p=2\) (exponent 2): partitions of 2: \((2)\to\mathbb{Z}_4\); \((1,1)\to\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_2\). For \(p=3\) (exponent 2): partitions of 2: \((2)\to\mathbb{Z}_9\); \((1,1)\to\mathbb{Z}_3\oplus\mathbb{Z}_3\). Combining: \(\mathbb{Z}_4\oplus\mathbb{Z}_9\cong\mathbb{Z}_{36}\); \(\mathbb{Z}_4\oplus\mathbb{Z}_3\oplus\mathbb{Z}_3\cong\mathbb{Z}_4\oplus\mathbb{Z}_3^2\); \(\mathbb{Z}_2^2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_9\); \(\mathbb{Z}_2^2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_3^2\). Four distinct abelian groups of order 36. \(\blacksquare\)
Let \(G\) be a group of order 36 and \(H\) a subgroup of order 4. Using Lagrange's theorem, state all possible orders of subgroups of \(G\) and prove that \(H\) need not be normal in \(G\).
Lagrange's Theorem: The order of any subgroup of a finite group \(G\) divides \(|G|\). Since \(|G|=36=2^2\cdot3^2\), the divisors are \(1,2,3,4,6,9,12,18,36\) — these are the only possible orders of subgroups. However, Lagrange's theorem gives a necessary condition, not a sufficient one: a subgroup of each order need not exist, and existence does not imply normality. A subgroup \(H\) of order 4 has index \([G:H]=9\), but index alone does not guarantee normality. Counterexample for normality: In \(S_3\) (order 6), the subgroup \(H=\{e,(12)\}\) of order 2 satisfies \((123)(12)(132)=(23)\notin H\), so \(H\) is not closed under conjugation and hence not normal. Similarly, in groups of order 36 one can construct subgroups of order 4 that fail normality. \(\blacksquare\)
Show that a group \(G\) of order \(p^2\) (where \(p\) is prime) is abelian. Every cyclic group is abelian; give an example of an abelian group that is not cyclic.
By the class equation \(|G|=|Z(G)|+\sum[G:C_G(x)]\), each non-central term divides \(p^2\) and is \(>1\), so must be \(p\) or \(p^2\). Since \(p\mid|Z(G)|\), we have \(|Z(G)|\in\{p,p^2\}\). If \(|Z(G)|=p^2\), then \(G=Z(G)\) and \(G\) is abelian. If \(|Z(G)|=p\), then \(|G/Z(G)|=p\), so \(G/Z(G)\) is cyclic. But \(G/Z(G)\) cyclic implies \(G\) is abelian (since for any \(a,b\in G\), writing \(aZ(G)=g^mZ(G)\) and \(bZ(G)=g^nZ(G)\) gives \(a=g^mz_1,b=g^nz_2\) with \(z_i\in Z(G)\), so \(ab=ba\)). This contradicts \(|Z(G)|=p
Non-cyclic abelian example: \(\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2\) (Klein four-group) is abelian but every non-identity element has order 2, so no element has order 4, and \(G\) is not cyclic. \(\blacksquare\)
Show that \(\mathbb{Z}[i]=\{a+bi:a,b\in\mathbb{Z}\}\) is a Euclidean domain with norm \(N(a+bi)=a^2+b^2\). Deduce that \(\mathbb{Z}[i]\) is a PID and a UFD.
Define \(N(\alpha)=|\alpha|^2=a^2+b^2\) for \(\alpha=a+bi\). Note \(N(\alpha\beta)=N(\alpha)N(\beta)\). Division algorithm: Given \(\alpha,\beta\in\mathbb{Z}[i]\), \(\beta\neq0\), compute \(\alpha/\beta=q\in\mathbb{C}\). Choose \(q_0=m+ni\in\mathbb{Z}[i]\) with \(m,n\) nearest integers to the real and imaginary parts of \(q\). Then \(|q-q_0|^2\le(\frac{1}{2})^2+(\frac{1}{2})^2=\frac{1}{2}<1\). Set \(r_0=\alpha-q_0\beta\). Then \(N(r_0)=N(\alpha-q_0\beta)=N(\beta)N(\alpha/\beta-q_0)=N(\beta)|q-q_0|^2
Let \(R\) be a commutative ring with identity and \(\phi:R\to S\) a ring homomorphism. Prove that \(\ker\phi\) is an ideal of \(R\) and that \(R/\ker\phi\cong\phi(R)\).
Let \(K=\ker\phi=\{r\in R:\phi(r)=0_S\}\). \(K\) is an ideal: (i) \(0\in K\) since \(\phi(0)=0\). (ii) If \(a,b\in K\): \(\phi(a-b)=\phi(a)-\phi(b)=0-0=0\), so \(a-b\in K\). (iii) If \(a\in K,r\in R\): \(\phi(ra)=\phi(r)\phi(a)=\phi(r)\cdot0=0\), so \(ra\in K\). Hence \(K\trianglelefteq R\). Isomorphism \(R/K\cong\phi(R)\): Define \(\bar\phi:R/K\to\phi(R)\) by \(\bar\phi(r+K)=\phi(r)\). Well-defined: \(r+K=r'+K\Rightarrow r-r'\in K\Rightarrow\phi(r)=\phi(r')\). Ring homomorphism: \(\bar\phi\) inherits the ring operations from \(\phi\). Injective: \(\bar\phi(r+K)=0\Rightarrow\phi(r)=0\Rightarrow r\in K\Rightarrow r+K=K=0_{R/K}\). Surjective onto \(\phi(R)\) by definition. Hence \(\bar\phi\) is a ring isomorphism. \(\blacksquare\)
Let \(H\) be a subgroup of index 2 in a group \(G\). Prove that \(H\) is normal in \(G\). Give an example of a subgroup of index 3 that is not normal.
Since \([G:H]=2\), there are exactly two left cosets of \(H\) in \(G\): namely \(H\) itself and \(G\setminus H\). For any \(g\in G\): Case 1: \(g\in H\). Then \(gH=H=Hg\). Case 2: \(g\notin H\). Then \(gH\neq H\), so \(gH=G\setminus H\). Similarly, \(Hg\neq H\), so \(Hg=G\setminus H\). In both cases \(gH=Hg\), so \(H\trianglelefteq G\). Non-normal index-3 example: In \(S_3\) (order 6), \(H=\{e,(12)\}\) has index 3. But \((123)(12)(132)=(23)\notin H\), so \(H\) is not closed under conjugation and is not normal. \(\blacksquare\)
Show that every Euclidean domain is a principal ideal domain. Is the converse true? Give an example.
Let \(R\) be an ED with norm function \(d:R\setminus\{0\}\to\mathbb{Z}_{\ge0}\). Let \(I\subseteq R\) be any non-zero ideal. Choose \(a\in I\) with \(d(a)\) minimal. Claim \(I=(a)\): For any \(b\in I\), by the division algorithm write \(b=qa+r\) where \(r=0\) or \(d(r)
Prove that a group in which every element satisfies \(x^2=e\) is abelian. Find all groups of order 4 up to isomorphism.
Abelian proof: Let \(a^2=b^2=e\) for all \(a,b\in G\), so every element is its own inverse (\(a^{-1}=a\)). Then \((ab)^2=e\Rightarrow abab=e\Rightarrow ab=b^{-1}a^{-1}=ba\). So \(G\) is abelian. Groups of order 4: Every group of order 4 has elements of order 1, 2, or 4 (by Lagrange). Case 1: There exists an element of order 4. Then \(G=\langle g\rangle\cong\mathbb{Z}_4\) (cyclic). Case 2: No element of order 4, so all non-identity elements have order 2. By the above, \(G\) is abelian, and \(G\cong\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2\) (Klein four-group). These are the only two groups of order 4 up to isomorphism. \(\blacksquare\)
Show that every field is an integral domain. Determine the characteristic of \(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(f(x))\) where \(f(x)\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Z}_p\).
Fields are integral domains: Let \(F\) be a field and suppose \(ab=0\) with \(a\neq0\). Since \(F\) is a field, \(a^{-1}\) exists. Multiply both sides by \(a^{-1}\): \(b=a^{-1}(ab)=a^{-1}\cdot0=0\). So \(F\) has no zero-divisors, making it an integral domain. Characteristic of \(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(f(x))\): Since \(f(x)\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Z}_p\), the ideal \((f(x))\) is maximal in \(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]\), so \(F=\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(f(x))\) is a field. The natural map \(\mathbb{Z}_p\to F\) (sending \(a\mapsto a+(f(x))\)) is an injective ring homomorphism, so \(\mathbb{Z}_p\) embeds as a subfield of \(F\). In \(F\), we have \(p\cdot1=\underbrace{1+\cdots+1}_{p}=0\) (since this holds in \(\mathbb{Z}_p\)), so \(\text{char}(F)=p\). If \(\deg f=n\), then \(|F|=p^n\). \(\blacksquare\)